A new concept; new venue;
new content; MIPIM, the world’s largest property summit, has hit a huge
milestone this year as the event celebrates its 30th birthday –with the
theme engaging the future.
The four-day convention
takes place in Cannes, France every year, and welcomes the most influential
business leaders and industry experts, from around the world, as well as featuring
speakers and panels that identify the most important issues impacting the
property market of today and the future.
The prestigious convention
took place last week and typically attracts around 23,000 visitors every year. Hundreds
of real estate professionals whose passion is to understand the property market
and exploit its potential, gather alongside brokers, investors, occupiers,
landlords and business services. This is a fantastic event and is networking at
its highest level.
The winner of this year’s Startup Competition is Spaceti, a PROPTECH products that helps to improve building environments and boosts productivity and profitability. Spaceti provides integrated solutions through its own sensors that interact with mobile devices to map how building environments can be improved. Founded in 2016, the company has already been established in New York, Stockholm and London. Six finalists made it to MIPIM after competing in heats all around the world, during MIPIM PROPTECH Europe, New York and Asia in 2018.
One of the most important issues that has recently shot up on the real estate agenda is healthcare, and the search for alternative investments with the rise of our aging population. Dr Pritpal S Tambar, CEO and Co-Founder of Bridging Health and Community spoke on a panel that addressed how to shift from a cure-orientated approach to healthcare.
For more information on the event, visit MIPIM’s website here.
Design Studio Architects have recently selected ‘Vista’ as its charity of the year, and thus our most recent blog has been inspired by this.
Currently almost two million UK residents live with sight loss, equating to approximately 1 in 30 people. Disturbingly these figures are set to rise, for example by 2020 the number will rise to 2,250,000 and by 2050 records will double to 4 million. The underlying causes being, an ageing population and an increasing number of obesity and diabetes diagnoses. Despite these high statistics there is little evidence of architectural firms or individuals in the UK specializing in designing for the visually impaired. As a firm we feel it imperative that architects start to focus on these issues, and have thus started evaluating cost effective solutions to meet these growing needs.
If you imagine being blind, perhaps you imagine total darkness. But for a large majority of people this is not always the case, instead they see varying shades of light and shadowing. Chris Downey, an architect who lost his sight aged 45, considers light a “poetic part of architecture that brings space to life”. Already Downey and a small minority of American architects have started to create large healthcare, transportation and residential schemes focused equivocally on benefiting blind people. Now we need to consider how to make this possible within the UK.
FIGURE 1: Conceptual image of light bright life to a space
A logical layout is one of the most important aspects of designing a building suited to the needs of visually impaired people, many of whom use their memory to navigate around a building. By keeping the design logical and simple independent navigation can be made significantly easier. An example of this would be locating toilets near a dining area or main reception area. Additionally it is important for spaces to incorporate as few obstructions as possible but to also ‘break up’ large areas seen as intimidating to people who struggle to see ‘landmarks’ within a space. To solve this difficulty we could make spaces seem more manageable by using partitioning and furniture to establish clear pathways and rectangular areas. Creating tactile pathways can also help people maintain direction, for example, a ‘red carpet’ or ‘yellow brick road’ leading directly to the reception desk is an enormous aid to visually impaired people.
Figure 2: ‘yellow brick road’ leading to the building’s functions
Lighting is an equally important aspect of designing buildings for people with sight difficulties as they require on average three times the amount of light required by the sighted population.Therefore it is considered beneficial to have brighter lighting at building entrances to enable eye adjustment from the bright outdoors to the artificial indoor lighting. Additionally the quality of lighting is of equal importance to the quantity. It is imperative that general room lighting is evenly distributed, and glare free with all fittings covered by diffusers. Similarly natural daylight should be diffused so it doesn’t cause direct or indirect glare. Ways in which we could do this include utilizing external awnings, vertical blinds, and window tinting.Alternatively to aid visually impaired people,emphasis on the room’s function, or destination with supplementary lighting such as spot lighting could be utilized. However it must also be remembered that placing light fittings at or below eye level would present a direct glare inhibiting vision.
The use of contrast is also considered important when designing for visually impaired people. Luminance contrast is preferred to colour contrast as it offers light/dark variances that are picked up more easily by people with low vision. In effect this aids people to locate important aspects of a building such as doorways, signs, handrails and most importantly hazards such as edges of steps. Subsequently contrasting textures can also be helpful, with tactile ground surface indicators commonly seen on
the edges of railway platforms.Furthermore when choosing materials for flooring a slip resistant matt is a preferred choice compared to highly reflective surfaces or ‘busy’ colourful floor patterns which disorient people with low vision.
It has been suggested the internal acoustics of a building should be considered when designing for visually impaired people. When negotiating a building, people with low vision gain important information from the environmental sounds around them. For example they are able to orientate themselves by using the sound of their cane as it makes contact with surfaces. Intrusive levels of background noise however can make interaction with others and orientation more difficult. Buildings with sound-reflective surfaces may require sound dampeners like carpets, curtains, and ceiling tiles to reduce noise levels. Care must be taken however, not to completely ‘deaden’ the sound within a building with the over-use of sound dampeners. Therefore buildings should contain a balance between sound-reflecting and sound-absorbing surfaces.
Design Studio Architects intend to spend the next 12 months gaining more knowledge of all the key issues that visually impaired people deal with on a daily basis. We aim and look forward to working alongside Vista in improving people’s lives through cost effective solutions incorporated in our design process.
Whether you can’t wait for Christmas or you’re a modern day Ebeneezer Scrooge, the time of year has arrived for you to dedicate much of your time – and more often than not, hard earned cash – on deciphering Christmas lists and buying presents for the closest people in your life. In the unfortunate circumstance that one of these people happens to be an architect (or architectural student for that matter!) you know how much of a nightmare this process can be!
Architects are seen as elusive, mysterious people; up all hours, talking in technical jargon and with an –bordering on obsessive- eye for detail and quality, which makes buying presents for these characters even harder to buy for. Below, the staff here at Design Studio Architects have put together a list of some of the most interesting and inventive gifts to make Santa that little bit less stressed this Christmas:
The Wacom Inkling is an amazing little device that you can clip onto a notebook to capture your notes or drawings. This gadget comes with a ballpoint pen (although a very fancy one) that incorperates a digital transmitter which interacts with the base receiver on the paper to record all of your penstrokes. These penstrokes are then converted into a digital linework that can be edited in most editing suites.
This 3d printer comes in a small form with an outer of milled aluminium. The most amazing part about this little machine is that it’s completely portable, self – containing and self – levelling! To use, you simply remove it from its cover, twist the arm into position, hand tighten it into place and let it work out the horizontal for itself! No more altering the bed angle and awkward changing and tightening of multiple parts. Its limits are your own creativity!
Ever wanted to feel like tony stark? Be able to pick up digital objects in the virtual world with your own physical hands? Or do you just fancy playing virtual tetris?
Leap motion has entered V2; with better programming and more fluid application, the Leap Motion tracks your hand and converts the movement of external objects into digital movement on your computer, this can be used for flying around in google maps or real work implications like handling 3d objects in Autodesk programmes such as Maya.
Magicplan is developing quickly and the idea behind it is a sound one. By standing in the centre of a room and taking photos of the corners and door openings your phone can draw a rough plan of a room in a few minutes. Combined with a laser measurer you can produce incredibly accurate plans in exceptionally quick times.
You know the scenario: Huge project, no time. The makers of the Ostrichpillow have decided to make your nights in the studio somewhat more comfortable. At the point at which you need to –metaphorically- stick your head in the ground and wish the world away, this gift will be a godsend. With openings for your head and hands, the pillow gives you a place to catch up with some sleep when you don’t have a bed around.
The black turtleneck is synonymous with the designer. No one knows why. Rem Koolhaas wore a black turtle neck, Steve Jobs wore a Black turtleneck. I want a black turtleneck. To complete the look grab yourself some circular or keyhole glasses and you’re in business.
This handy little mug is as beautiful in aesthetics as its purpose: to keep your hot drink of choice warm. An all ceramic mug with a hand dipped glaze, the Steep won’t make your tea taste strange like other metallic flasks. And with a screw on top, even when you get called out on a survey, you can take your drink in a container as classy as unique as you feel.
Whether you’re out on a survey or just walking to work; when it starts raining the worst thing that can happen is the wind picking up and breaking your barrier to the elements. The slick Senz umbrella is windproof up to 70mph, will never go in-side out and with strengthened, silver ABS and Evafoam grip, the handle will be as sturdy and the canopy.
What Impact Could 3D Printing Have On The Architect?
The job of Architect has remained a popular, albeit underpaid profession over the years whilst skilled tradesmen such as carpenters and stonemasons have dwindled in numbers. A study of over 300,000 small businesses by Simply Business indicate that, the number of joiners has dropped by around 17 percent in the last three years and “Numerous other trades such as builders, carpenters and painter/decorators, have also seen their numbers decrease”, (Simply Business, 2013).
This depreciation is largely due to the increased speed and mass scale at which items, such as furniture, can be produced using automated machinery. Large companies, such as Ikea are able to afford large scale manufacturing equipment allowing them to mass produce flat pack furniture which is easy to assemble and a fraction of the cost of what a carpenter might charge for his work.
Architect, NeriOxman argues that 3D printing could give power back to the trades people providing them with the ability to compete with the mass production capabilities of large companies, “craft meets the machine in rapid fabrication…we can generate craft with the help of technology”(Oxman, 2013).
As noble as Oxman’s views are if we consider her argument in relation to the development of 3D printing within architecture, rather than, ‘generating craft with … technology’, she is actually striving for a technological takeover which could see the destruction of architectural ‘craft’.
Unfortunately, rather than giving any form of craft back to the architect, there is a risk that automation may cause the job of the architect to go much the same way of the carpenter. When machines like Bertram’s are common place within the architectural industry, they will be able to mass produce buildings in much the same way Ikea mass produces furniture.
There is already a demand for cheap efficient housing. If construction firms like Mansell bought enough of Sebastian Bertram’s Contour Crafter’s (CC), and started their own housing construction companies, this could put the role of the architect under threat. In theory, a company could hire its own small team of architects or designers who could then produce 3D models of housing designs which could be sent to the companies CC machines for printing on site. Taking advantage of the massively reduced labour costs and rapid fabrication attributed to the use of Contour Crafters, companies could drive the price of houses down so low that an architect could simply not afford to compete. This is the antithesis of what Oxman was trying to argue in the first place.
Despite its many limitations, the rapid nature of this new construction process does create numerous opportunities for architects, especially in attempting to solve the global problem of a lack of social housing. It has already been identified that CC’s like Bertram’s can mass produce housing very quickly, and due to the lack of labour involved, at a cost which is affordable to be used as social housing.
Being able to produce structural, efficient houses in days rather than months or years would hugely benefit those without homes. This could be as simple as helping the social housing problem faced by those in the UK or it could be the answer to more complex issues such as, providing quick accommodation to victims of natural disasters.
Throughout history, every manufacturing industry to date has seen automated machinery revolutionise their trade. Now, thanks to pioneers like Sebastian Bertram, it’s the architectural industries turn to face the revolution.
Since the industrial revolution the world’s industry has been racing toward a future of complete automation from the creation of the conveyor belt system through to the introduction of robotics into vehicle manufacture.
With automated machinery dominating almost every modern manufacturing process, pioneers in automated design have spent the last 3 decades developing and refining the “3D Printer”, a device which would allow any object to be printed from whatever material is inputted in the machine.
Until recently, the construction industry has been dominated by tooling machines that drill or cut away material to create standardised elements such as PVC windows and doors. This is a subtractive process rather like a sculptor might carve a statue out a solid piece of marble. Building construction should be a more human process of building up blocks to create a space designed by an architect. Whilst using standardised elements may have sped up the construction industry, it has limited architect’s scope for design, creating catalogues of elements which are easier and cheaper to choose from than to design bespoke.
3D printing is a form of ‘additive manufacturing’, adding materials together in a layer system, which differs greatly from traditional ‘subtractive’ manufacturing techniques allowing architects to be far more creative in their design whilst still achieving the same cheap build cost, and even quicker construction time than if they had used standardised materials.
How Could 3D Printers Be Used Within Architecture?
In the future, 3D printing technologies could allow architects to “bypass time consuming pre-production stages by fabricating physical models from the data within a ‘solid-model’ CAD file” (Callicott, 2001). Rather than spending hours reproducing models of building designs, 3D printers would allow quick fabrication of scaled down models, precise to the specification of the technical drawings. Having been translated from architectural drawings, the level of detail within the physical models would make it far easier for the architects to identify what worked within the building’s design and what did not. Furthermore, since a 3D printed model would be a purely scaled down fabrication of 3D CAD drawings the same drawings could potentially be printed at 1:1 scale to construct an entire building.
The ability to print buildings at 1:1 may sound fraught with difficulties but German designer, Sebastian Bertram, believes he has managed to design a 3D printer, combined with robotics, which has the ability to print buildings out of concrete. “The robot “prints” contours of a building shell layer by layer using fast-drying concrete. Within just a couple of weeks, an entire estate could be produced” (Turner, 2012). Bertram’s machines have been dubbed ‘contour crafters’ as they ‘print contours’ of buildings as opposed to layers of objects. The project itself is named “One house a day” (Dehue, 2012), The diagram below displays stills taken from a video created by Mr Bertram outlining the way his Contour Crafters will eventually work.
Finally we’ve come to the last part of the “What is ‘Architectural Identity?'” series. Having already looked at: aesthetics, function, historic/urban context and human impact, we look towards the last sub-topic on the subject, representation. Now this sub-topic is probably the most debatable category out of the previous categories we’ve touched on. Reason behind this? Opinions. Everyone has one. Sometimes people will agree on one thing whilst others will disagree completely or to a certain extent. Architecture isn’t immune to such subjective opinions, whether it is praise or criticism. A large part of architecture is not just to create inhabitable space in where we may co-exist with each other and our surroundings, not just how the building looks or works, but also what the building is suppose to ’embody’. This is where various factors come in to play, from architectural style to construction, contextual and social impact. How a building is portrayed in its essence is the best way to describe how it is represented. If we look back one more time to Zaha Hadid’s design for the Tokyo Olympic Stadium for the 2020 Olympics.
What is the stadium itself suppose to represent? What did Zaha Hadid and her architectural studio have in mind when designing the stadium? According to Dezeen, she states “The stadium will become an integral part of Tokyo’s urban fabric, directly engaging with the surrounding cityscape to connect and carve the elegant forms of the design…our three decades of research into Japanese architecture and urbanism is evident in our winning design and we greatly look forward to building the new National Stadium”. Project director of the proposal, Jim Heverin mentions the concept of the stadium: “The articulation, how [the design] manifests itself, really needs to come from a single vision, otherwise there won’t be authorship, there won’t be an authentic voice behind it….you get that in all good buildings, all good pieces of design. I don’t think [the design] is something that you can decide by committee….what we see in Japan is both innovation and craftsmanship, both together is what people have always liked about Japan.” he toldKyodo News (via InsideTheGames.biz).
Whilst talking to Kyodo News, Heverin continues: “We’ve tried to continue the park through the Stadium as a walk….at the moment you can’t walk across the site but this walkway and the concourse will allow you to walk through the site and run through the Stadium and this way it will become, hopefully, part of the park.” He goes on to say: “The most important thing is how it feels for the people…that it’s not some object that just dominates in the background. I think if we succeed in the fact that its open and it has this continuity, then I really think that this will be seen as a vibrant addition to the area. You have a real potential for all of this to act as a more active sports hub area.” With that in mind, you can begin to see that the big hope for this structure is that it not only becomes a hotspot attraction, not only to become a premier sporting hub, not to only harmoniously co-exist with the existing landscape but to become a long-standing, iconic legacy, something the people of Japan will be proud to call their own, now and years from now. The inter-galactic structure does boast the personality of the nation, Japan’s unabashed craziness, their pioneering goals in innovative technologies and discoveries, creating a sense of presence and impact, in the daily lives of the public, as well as creating a popular tourist destination for the city. The issue of people is a big thing in Japan, with their satisfactory to decent standards of quality living, their large aging populace, with the varied mix of families and single individuals, the need to create a place that is made accessible and usable for everyone is critical. It’s important that this structure will not only be just the embodiment of the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, even though the Olympic brand must be represented in the highest regard. It will need to be the perfect embodiment of the host country and its citizens. When Tokyo takes to the world stage, the whole world will be watching. Representation is key.
Some examples varied architectural representations include: the timeless Greek Parthenon, the historical enriched Hagia Sophia, the ‘poster-boy’ of American architecture, Frank Lloyd Wright’s greatest work: Fallingwater, the architectural brand infusion of Burberry (Chicago) and the soon to be finished the One World Trade Centre (Freedom Tower) at Ground Zero.
Architecture has one main purpose and one only, to serve the needs of man. This could take on different forms, from the typical residential homes of individuals and families, office towers for businesses and corporations, shops for services and goods and so on. The point of architecture is to create inhabitable spaces for which can be occupied for whatever its main use is. How a building impacts an individual or a number of people depends on it as a whole, how does it work? How does it look? How long will it last? How does it improve my life? All these questions and more can greatly influence how a building is designed, constructed, funded, ultimately it can influence the very lifespan of a project, from concept design to completion. Looking towards the Tokyo Olympic 2020 stadium, how will it impact the general public? How will it affect the local residents, the city and the world in the long-run?
The stadium proposal seems adamant on making the building more flexible beyond the Olympic events, creating a venue that is more people-friendly and engaging, that can host various artistic and cultural events as well as benefiting the local district, the city and by extension, the country. With the built-in exhibition centre (a la Zaragoza Bridge Pavilion style), the stadium proposal tries to be more than just a sporting stadium, that it can adapt to the times and various possible functions. No doubt when the structure is completed that it will look stupendous and extravagant. Will it outshine the previous stadiums and ceremonies? Most definitely. With the whole Olympic festivities will bring to Japan a wealth of economic income and several hundreds of thousands tourists in. The memorable event will give Japan the biggest global sporting competition stage (ignoring the FIFA World Cup), grabbing the world’s attention. The human factor when dealing with the Olympics is almost indescribable. Being there physically and taking part in the festivities and sporting events creates memorable moments in people, both local and visiting. Architecture, which has over the years been not just design, but also a form of communication and narrative in society, shaping our urban landscapes, defining our society in ways that are obvious and oblivious to us. Buildings have a way of becoming a small or big part of our lives, whether its somewhere we visited on holiday and remember fondly, a place where we first met our spouses, the first family home where all the kids grew up in, the same bar we go to every Friday night with our friends, whatever the situation, buildings tend to touch and influence us in the most peculiar ways sometimes.
Will Zaha Hadid’s proposal be a positive impact on the populace, not just during the Olympics but more importantly, afterwards? How will the legacy of the Games affect people 5, 10, 20 years after? We’ll just have to wait and see. In the meantime, examples of buildings that have that ‘human impact’ factor include: the wonderfully vivid and artsy Parc Guell, the botanic paradise that is known as the Gardens by the Bay, the highest of the high monolith Burj Khalifa, France’s most recognised structure, the Eiffel Tower and the beautiful existing structures found within the city of Petra, particularly the Al Khazneh.
Name: Parc Guell
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Architects: Antoni Gaudi
Name: Gardens by the Bay
Location: Marina Bay, Singapore
Architects: Wilkinson Eyre Architects
Name: Burj Khalifa
Location: Dubai, UAE
Architects: Adrian Smith of SOM
Name: Eiffel Tower
Location: Paris, France
Architect/Engineers: Stephen Sauvestre/Gustav Eiffel, Maurice Koechlin and Émile Nouguier
Generally speaking, architecture has been around for thousands & thousands of years, ranging from Neolithic to Egyptian, Greek and Roman. It has developed and expanded from numerous cultures, traditions, styles, human impact, periodic times, religion and natural phenomena. Architecture is naturally one of the oldest crafts of the ‘design’ industry and has continued to be one of the greatest human contributions to society. Architecture is more than just a building, whether it is a private house, an office block or a shopping centre. The craft has the opportunity to become something that impacts people, to create such an impact on society that it becomes a iconic structure, rich with history that redefines the narrative and shape of the urban landscape, becoming a significant, memorable part of people’s lives and remaining timeless throughout the ages. That is part of the power of architecture, so with that in mind, looking back at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics Stadium proposal, we can try to understand what Zaha Hadid is trying to achieve through her design.
With it’s overarching curves and contextual dominance, the structure location is said to be in the Jingu area, one of “Tokyo Vision 2020″‘ sport designated areas. The area is nearby Yoyogi Park, located in the Shibuya district of Tokyo, the capital city of Japan. Yoyogi Park is close to Harajuku Station, and other landmarks in the area include the Meiji Jingu Shrine and the Yoyogi National Gymnasium. The park is noted also for its cherry blossom trees, alongside it’s featured sport courts, bike pathways, bike rentals & picnic areas. The park is also a popular venue for Japanese rock music concerts. The site is also historic for being the location of Japan’s first successful aircraft took flight in 1910, later becoming an army parade vicinity. Projected to be completed by 2019, the stadium will host the opening and closing ceremonies as well as sporting events, including athletics, rugby & soccer. The owners, Japan Sport Council, have plans for the stadium to host the Rugby World Cup in 2019. The Olympic Stadium, as well as most of the other Olympic venues are all located within the ‘Heritage Zone’ & “Tokyo Bay Zone”, each zone approximately 8000m in diameter (https://tokyo2020.jp/en/plan/venue/).
In the on-going debate of whether the stadium is ‘worth its weight’ (long-term) in size and cost, many believe it will set a new precedent in reshaping the urban context of the site’s location, bringing social, sporting and economical benefits as well as becoming a lasting legacy for Japan. Without trying to sound to cynical, the general purpose of an Olympic Bid is ‘lasting legacy’ and that’s what becomes the main focus of everything from national support, to funding, to venues. A quote from Tadao Ando (Chairman of the competition panel) states: “The entry’s dynamic and futuristic design embodies the messages Japan would like to convey to the rest of the world. I believe this stadium will become a shrine for world sport for the next 100 years”. Others disagree, such as Fumihiko Maki who mentions: “The problems I see with the planned stadium all relate to the issue of scale”, whilst claiming the design itself it’s at fault but needs to be reduced in size and become more sustainable. There are those who are in favour of the proposal stating that scaling it back in size would cause more problems then necessary: “”The articulation, how [the design] manifests itself, really needs to come from a single vision, otherwise there won’t be authorship, there won’t be an authentic voice behind it…you get that in all good buildings, all good pieces of design”.
Due to the public outcry of the Japanese public as well as many in the architectural business, the Japan Sport Council have stated that they would scale down the proposed floor plan by one-quarter, according to IBTimes. Reducing the floor area will cut costs down to 180 billion yen, whilst keeping with majority of the design scheme and height estimations, even though many are saying that the reduced cost is still higher then originally pledged during the initial stages. But whether this structure will become a positive influence on the contextual layout and the social impact of the district (and city), only time will tell. There are many buildings that have impacted their respective locations and citizens, but how many buildings have last for hundreds of years that are still with us today? Examples of some buildings that have historical and cultural impact includes the dramatic Sydney Opera House, the prominent Empire State Building, the majestic Taj Mahal, the elegant Louvre and the galactic Cathedral of Brasilia.
A self-build project can help many of us turn our dream homes into reality. Despite the poor economy, the UK has seen a soar in self-build developments over the past year, with thousands of us creating a property that’s specified to our needs and requirements. The procedure can be overwhelming and daunting to those who decide to take this on, with the stress of finding a plot to hiring the right professionals. Nevertheless the outcomes can be extremely rewarding and with the variety of self-build mortgages available; financing can be one less worry on your mind.
Building societies in Leicestershire offer a range of mortgages for self-builders. The new mortgage offered by “Hinckley & Rugby Building Society”, requires drawings to be supervised by a registered RIBA qualified Architect. The drawings are submitted with the mortgage application, building specifications and other necessary planning and building approvals, ensuring that the plans and regulations are to a professional standard. But land must have already been purchased before applying for this mortgage. Whereas “The Loughborough Building Society”, offer a mortgage available to a larger audience. This includes applicants who wish to;
+ Buy land and build a new property
+ Raise capital and build on land they already own
+ Convert an existing structure into a home
+ Purchase an existing property, demolish and rebuild
The biggest differentiation between a self-build mortgage and a regular residential mortgage is that funds are given to you during different stages of the build, instead of just one large lump sum, ensuring that money is spent as planned. Advantages also include, the self build mortgage the saving on stamp duty.
To ensure you self-build project goes as intended, it is advisable to hire trusted and experienced professionals. A range of professionals will be required for the job, such as builders, contractors, structural engineers and last but not least, an Architect.
So what exactly can you expect from an Architect? Creative flair, comprehensive knowledge and specialist guidance are just a few examples of the great qualities that an Architect can hold. These attributes can prove to be vital to any self-build project and with the help of the right professional; a build can often hold more style and elegance than one designed without an Architect.
There is often a misconception that Architects are only involved in the design process. But as well as giving you advise on how to use space efficiently and the different types of materials and fittings available, they can also provide you with invaluable assistance when planning and building are concerned. These areas are known to be stressful and daunting, but can be diminished with the support of an Architect. Some projects may even be managed by the Architects themselves, insuring that your self-build project is built on time and to budget.
For more information and advice on self-builds visit: